ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Uncertainty of Fit - Serving People with Borderline Personality Disorder on an Assertive Community Treatment Team Setting: Experiences and Perspectives of Clinicians from a Flexible ACT Team.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with Borderline Personality Disorder (PBPD) have been historically excluded from Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams. The 'gold standard' ACT service model in community psychiatry aims to serve people with serious mental illness (SMI), typically diagnosed with psychotic and mood disorders. For various clinical, administrative, and model innovation reasons, PBPD are notably present on ACT teams, presenting unique clinical challenges; yet clinician perspectives and experiences are little known. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis on experiences and perspectives of clinicians from a well-established ACT team in an academic setting that transitioned to a Flexible ACT team in Toronto, Canada. Clinicians reported working with PBPD presents unique training, skills, clinical, team, system, and personal level challenges Five main themes included: (1) Lack of specific training among clinicians in serving people with BPD; (2) Diverse views of suitability of ACT for PBPD; (3) Specific challenges for clinicians working with PBPD on ACT; (4) Positive aspects of using ACT to serve PBPD; (5) Potential adaptive changes to ACT teams working with PBPD. Conclusion: Having PBPD on ACT teams is a little acknowledged and less known area of ACT and has significant impact on ACT services. Further attention to training and skill building, service adaptation, and research that improve care and therapeutic relationships with PBPD on ACT are warranted. Having PBPD on ACT teams is a little acknowledged and less known area of ACT and has significant impact on ACT services. Further attention to training and skill building, service adaptation, and research that improve care and therapeutic relationships with PBPD on ACT are warranted.
Identifiers
42126729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.