ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Cellular homeostasis and oncology safety of low pulse frequency laser for photobiomodulation in oral and dermal cells.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of low-level laser-based photobiomodulation (PBM) on cellular homeostasis and oncology safety by examining viability and proliferation in gingival fibroblasts (HGFs), human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs), and MCF-7 breast cancer cells under different irradiation conditions, and by assessing the signaling-related protein expression in HGFs. The HGFs, HDFs, and MCF-7 cells were exposed to 808 nm diode laser irradiation at 2 and 3 J/cm², applied immediately or 24 h after seeding or continuous dose specifically for MCF-7. Cell viability and metabolic activity were assessed using the MTT assay, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed in HGFs to evaluate the expression of Ki-67, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), integrin β1, COX-1, and COX-2. PBM did not induce cytotoxic effects or excessive proliferation in any cell line. Metabolic activity and growth trends were comparable to non-irradiated controls, preserving cellular homeostasis in fibroblast. Notably, PBM exhibited a neutral effect of MCF-7 cells, supporting its in vitro oncologic safety under the tested conditions. While no significant upregulation of proliferative or inflammatory markers was observed in HGFs. PBM at conservative parameters (2-3 J/cm²) preserves cellular homeostasis and suggests a neutral in vitro effect on neoplastic cells. These findings suggest that these specific protocols are safe for adjunctive clinical applications without promoting undesirable proliferative or inflammatory responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.