Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126668›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026

Nationwide quality indicator survey on the current practice of esophageal cancer management in Japan: report from the guideline committee for the 6th edition of the Japanese Esophageal Cancer Practice Guidelines.

Eisuke Booka, Hiroya Takeuchi, Ryu Ishihara, Katsunori Iijima, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Yoshinori Ito, Takashi Oyama, Ken Kato, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Hiroshi Kawachi and 18 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Eisuke BookaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. takeuchi@hama-med.ac.jp.
Ryu IshiharaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Katsunori IijimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Hitoshi IshikawaQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi OyamaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KawakuboDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KawachiDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasue KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shiko KuribayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Koji KonoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Takashi KojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroshi SaekiDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Takahiro TsushimaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Minako FujiwaraDepartment of Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Satoru MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko MinashiClinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Tatsuya MiyazakiDepartment of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Haramachi Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Manabu MutoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takako YoshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Toshiyuki YoshioDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiki YamajiDivision of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoki YamatsujiDepartment of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Masahiro YoshidaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the dissemination and real-world implementation of recommendations from the 5th Edition of the Japanese Esophageal Cancer Practice Guidelines and to inform development of the upcoming 6th Edition, the Guideline Committee of the Japanese Esophageal Society conducted a nationwide Quality Indicator (QI) survey in Japan.

methodsA nationwide, cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire survey was distributed to 381 certified institutions participating in the 2023 National Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan. Conducted in November 2024, the survey covered six domains-epidemiology, surgery, endoscopy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and pathology-reflecting key recommendations of the 5th Edition. Responses were summarized descriptively at the institutional level.

resultsValid responses were obtained from 190 institutions (49.9%). Smoking cessation guidance was implemented in more than 90% of institutions, and over 90% also provided guidance on alcohol abstinence or moderation, although complete alcohol abstinence was less uniformly recommended. Minimally invasive, including robot-assisted, esophagectomy was adopted by over 90% of institutions. The proportion of institutions performing prophylactic cervical lymph node dissection varied by tumor location and stage, reflecting contemporary staging concepts. The DCF regimen was the predominant neoadjuvant therapy for stage II/III disease (94.7%), and immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy was widely used for unresectable or recurrent disease. Advanced endoscopic diagnostic modalities, including magnifying and image-enhanced endoscopy, were widely adopted.

conclusionsThis nationwide QI survey demonstrates broad adherence to guideline-based multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer in Japan and provides an evidence base for refining recommendations in the 6th Edition of the Japanese Esophageal Cancer Practice Guidelines.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleEsophagectomyGuideline AdherenceHumansJapanNeoplasm StagingSurveys and QuestionnairesEsophageal cancerGuideline adherenceJapanMultidisciplinary treatmentNationwide surveyQuality indicator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.