Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia (AcuDysg): a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study investigated the effectiveness of dysgeusia-specific acupuncture combined with self-acupressure compared to supportive acupuncture and self-acupressure for chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia in cancer patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and dysgeusia.
methodsThis multicenter, randomized, controlled, two-armed parallel-group, single-blind trial included cancer patients with CRF and dysgeusia during chemotherapy. All participants received CRF treatment consisting of eight acupuncture sessions over 8 weeks and had access to an eLearning course for self-acupressure. Patients in the intervention group received additional dysgeusia-specific acupuncture treatment and an eLearning with instructions to acupressure points, whereas the control group received an intervention focused solely on addressing CRF. The main outcome was perceived dysgeusia over 8 weeks, measured weekly after each acupuncture session on a numeric rating scale from 1 to 10. Other outcomes included taste and smell tests, and assessments of perceived dysgeusia, fatigue, distress, and quality of life. Due to a small sample size, results can be only judged exploratory. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee (CEC) (Kanton Zürich Kantonale Ethikkommission) (approval no. KEK-ZH-Nr. 2020-01900).
resultsSince we included only twenty-one patients (11 intervention, 10 control, 90% female) instead of the target sample size of 130, no confirmatory effectiveness analyses were conducted. All participants showed a substantial decrease in dysgeusia over time, regardless of treatment type (estimated mean reduction per session - 0.30; 95% CI - 0.43 to - 0.18), reflecting a 0.30-point reduction per session. Quality of life and cancer-related fatigue improved over time. The exploratory analyses did not show substantial differences between groups in any outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionsExploratory findings showed no substantial differences between the study groups in perceived dysgeusia, but both study groups improved over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00023348 at 03.11.2020, SNCTP000004128.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.