ReviewBiological cybernetics2026
Dynamical mechanisms for coordinating long-term working memory based on the precision of spike-timing in cortical neurons.
Review in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- tDCS synchronous robotic training on lower-limb with post-stroke hemiplegia: a comparative study between synchronous and sequential group.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- A proposal for realizing cognitive functions using traveling waves, phase-locked and synchronized patterns, holography, neural mixing, and single sideband communications.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the last century, most sensorimotor studies of cortical neurons relied on average firing rates. Rate coding is efficient for fast sensorimotor processing that occurs within a few seconds. Much less is known about the neural mechanisms underlying long-term working memory with a time scale of hours (Ericsson and Kintsch in Psychol Rev 102(2):211, 1995). Cognitive states may not have sensory or motor correlates. For example, you can sit in a quiet room making plan without moving or sensory processing. You can also make plans while out walking. This suggests that the neural substrate for cognitive states neither depends on nor interferes with ongoing sensorimotor brain activity. In this perspective, I make the case for a possible second tier of neural activity that coexists with the well-established sensorimotor tier. The prominent physiological feature of the second tier is coordinated spike timing activity. The interplay of data supporting this hypothesis involves three puzzling yet highly intriguing experimental observations, without any obvious indication that they might actually represent different aspects of a single functional organization. First, consider the precision of spiking in individual neurons. The discovery of millisecond-precision spike initiation in cortical neurons was unexpected (Mainen and Sejnowski in Science 268:1503-1506, 1995). Even more striking was the precision of spiking in vivo, in response to rapidly fluctuating sensory inputs. Second, high temporal resolution can also mediate spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) by controlling the relative timing of presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes at the millisecond scale. Third, we observe waves across many frequency bands traveling across the cortex. Strikingly, their timing is highly precise. Gamma waves, for example, which are triggered by attention, can plausibly trigger STDP that lasts for hours in cortical neurons. This temporary cortical network, ostensibly a second tier of functionality, rides astride the long-term sensorimotor network and could support cognitive processing and long-term working memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.