ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2026
[Basics in the EP lab-how and when to pace?]
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Basics in the EP lab-how and when to pace?]Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is a central tool in the evaluation and management of arrhythmias in the electrophysiological laboratory. Targeted atrial and ventricular pacing maneuvers allow induction, mechanistic characterization, and termination of arrhythmias. This provides important insights into the involved conduction pathways, anatomical location, and the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate, thereby forming the basis for a tailored ablation strategy. A structured approach even prior to the first stimulation maneuver establishes the foundation for successful diagnosis and therapy (ensuring stable catheter positions, optimal signal quality, and reliable capture). Understanding fundamental principles such as incremental, programmed, burst and overdrive stimulation is essential for accurate interpretation of electrophysiological responses. The consolidation of knowledge over the past three decades has helped ensure that, today, a few key maneuvers are usually sufficient to enable a rapid and reliable diagnosis. These play a key role in differentiating regular narrow-complex tachycardias, distinguishing wide-complex tachycardias, and identifying reentrant vs. nonreentrant mechanisms. They are also indispensable for assessing procedural endpoints after ablation, including confirmation of noninducibility of the clinical tachycardia or successful pulmonary vein isolation. The present review further outlines practical solutions to common challenges such as inconsistent pacing responses, far-field signals, and nonreproducible arrhythmia induction. Overall, systematic application of pacing maneuvers enables precise mechanistic classification of tachycardias and significantly contributes to safe, efficient, and individualized electrophysiological therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42126577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.