Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126538›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Sciatica beyond the spine: a prospective study on laparoscopic neurolysis of pelvic sciatic and sacral nerves demonstrating long-term improvements in pain, function, mood, and bladder symptoms (VAS, SF-36, PHQ-9, OAB-V8).

Ahmet Kale, Ebru Kale, Elif Beyza Özer, Elif Begüm Kale, Taner Usta, Sıla Kale, Engin Oral

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmet KaleHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey. ahmetkale5@gmail.com.
Ebru KaleHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif Beyza ÖzerHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif Begüm KaleHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Taner UstaHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sıla KaleHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Engin OralHealth Science University, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrapelvic entrapment of the sciatic and sacral nerve roots can cause chronic pelvic pain, sciatica, and symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria, vulvodynia, coccygodynia, and pudendal neuralgia. Conventional spine-focused approaches often overlook this cause. This study assessed whether laparoscopic nerve decompression improves pain and related outcomes.

methodsBetween November 2022 and April 2024, 25 women (median age: 36 years) with ≥ 2 years of refractory pelvic neuropathic pain underwent laparoscopic decompression of the sciatic and sacral plexus. Diagnosis was confirmed via neuropelveological exam and 3-Tesla MRI. Patient-reported outcomes-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for nine pain domains, SF-36, PHQ-9, and OAB-V8-were collected preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Operative details and complications were recorded.

resultsAll surgeries were completed laparoscopically with no conversions or motor deficits. Median operative time was 143.5 min. VAS scores decreased by 70-90% at one month (p ≤ 0.001) and remained improved at 6 and 12 months. SF-36 subscales improved significantly by month 1 and peaked at month 6. PHQ-9 dropped from 18.2 to 6.8 at 12 months (p < 0.001). OAB-V8 scores also showed significant improvement (p < 0.05).

conclusionsLaparoscopic decompression of intrapelvic sciatic and sacral nerves appears safe and effective, providing substantial and sustained improvements in pain, quality of life, mood, and bladder symptoms. Further randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalLaparoscopyLumbosacral PlexusPelvic PainSciaticaSciatic NerveAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultLaparoscopic nerve decompressionNeuropathic painPelvic painSacral plexusSciatica

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.