ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Antimicrobial efficacy of 45S5 and borosilicate bioglasses against multidrug-resistant bacteria: an in vitro assay.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several bioceramics have been developed to promote bone repair. However, postoperative infections in the implanted area may led to in bone resorption. The widespread use of antimicrobials has contributed to the increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, posing an additional challenge to therapeutics. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and resistance-inducing potential of two bioceramic formulations, 45S5 bioglass and borosilicate bioglass (BVBS), against multidrug-resistant strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP), Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibacterial activity was determined by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and time-kill kinetics. Resistance-inducing capacity was assessed by bacterial growth after 48 h of exposure to 800 mg/mL of each bioceramic. Bioglass 45S5 demonstrated greater antimicrobial activity, with an MIC of 50 mg/mL for E. coli and P. aeruginosa and 100 mg/mL for MRSP, and complete eradication of the strains after 8 h. BVBS presented an MIC of 100 mg/mL for E. coli and P. aeruginosa, and 200 mg/mL for MRSP, with complete bacterial elimination within 24 h. No resistance induction was observed for 45S5 in any of the strains, and BVBS showed this effect only on E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains. The results indicate that both formulations were effective against multidrug-resistant bacteria, with bioglass 45S5 being the most promising alternative due to its greater antimicrobial efficacy and lack of resistance induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.