ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Multi-method Analysis of Implementation Determinants and Strategies to Support the Implementation of Contingency Management for Methamphetamine Use in an HIV Care Setting.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methamphetamine use is prevalent among people with HIV (PWH) and complicates HIV care. Integrated substance use and HIV care services are recommended, yet rarely available. Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based treatment for methamphetamine use, but its implementation within HIV primary care is limited. This study identified determinants and strategies to support CM implementation in HIV care. Key informants from an HIV clinic at an academic medical center (n = 15 patients; n = 15 providers) completed semi-structured interviews and a survey. A rapid qualitative analysis guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework identified implementation determinants, and potential strategies were classified using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. Both patient and provider participants rated CM as acceptable (M = 3.72 and 4.55/5) and appropriate (M = 3.85 and 4.54/5). Providers also rated CM as feasible (M = 4.08/5) and reported strong support for integrating CM into HIV care, citing the high priority of addressing methamphetamine use. Facilitators included the clinic's person-centered culture and providers' familiarity with substance use treatment. Barriers included perceptions that reinforcer values in standard CM protocols were low, limited staffing, and competing provider demands. Suggested implementation strategies included adapting CM (e.g., increasing reinforcer value), patient-directed outreach/advertisements, and provider education and support (e.g., reminders about CM availability and referral processes). Findings indicate strong support for integrating CM into HIV primary care, while noting challenges to implementation. Addressing these determinants through targeted multi-level implementation strategies may enhance CM adoption and sustainment in HIV care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42126510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.