ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Fatal esophageal adenocarcinoma in a pregnant woman mimicking gestational hyperemesis.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal carcinoma is very rare in young people, particularly during pregnancy. We present a rare fatal case of esophageal adenocarcinoma in a 26.-year old pregnant woman with the full-term delivery of a healthy baby. Alarming symptoms despite being considered hyperemesis gravidarum raised suspicion of the upper digestive system neoplasia, which was confirmed by subsequent diagnostic work-up, including endoscopy, biopsy, and histopathology. Although the deceased's family suspected possible medical negligence, it was not proven, but was evaluated and interpreted as an unintended outcome. Namely, the pregnant woman did not want to undergo a diagnostic examination of the digestive system in the 20th week of pregnancy, but almost towards the end of the pregnancy, when a malignant neoplasm of the esophagus was diagnosed. After delivery of health baby, she died two months later. This unfortunate case underscores the necessity of maintaining a high index of suspicion for malignancy in persistent gastrooesophageal symptoms during pregnancy. The refusal of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures by the patient dictated the dissemination of the disease and the fatal outcome, which could not be influenced by the professional malpractice, and therefore certainly has a forensically and clinically interesting discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42126508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.