ArticleOdontology2026
Automated classification of sagittal, vertical, and transverse malocclusions from 3D intraoral scans via a multi-head CNN framework.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a multi-task deep learning model for the simultaneous classification of sagittal, vertical, and transverse malocclusion components, as well as midline deviation, using three-dimensional (3D) intraoral scan (IOS) data. A total of 801 anonymized 3D IOS datasets were retrospectively collected. Surface mesh (STL) files were standardized and converted into six-view two-dimensional (2D) representations. This approach preserved morphological information while enabling the use of transfer learning-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs). A shared-backbone, multi-head architecture was designed to perform simultaneous classification tasks. Six CNN backbones were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. EfficientNetV2B3 achieved the highest performance in anterior bite classification (accuracy: 80%, ROC-AUC ≈ 0.89). ResNet50 provided the most balanced results for sagittal and midline classification. Transverse occlusion classification showed comparatively lower performance across all models. Multi-view representations derived from 3D intraoral scans enable simultaneous and clinically relevant classification of multiple malocclusion components. While strong performance was observed for anterior bite and midline tasks, sagittal and transverse classifications remain more challenging. IOS-based multi-task AI systems may serve as supportive tools in orthodontic diagnosis and digital workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.