Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126486›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

A systematic evaluation of protein allosteric site prediction tools with independent datasets.

Yuanbao Ai, Haixiao Li, Xuemei Huang, Sen Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanbao Ai *Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), Wuhan, 430068, China.
Haixiao Li *Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), Wuhan, 430068, China.
Xuemei HuangHubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), Wuhan, 430068, China.
Sen LiuHubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), Wuhan, 430068, China. senliu.ctgu@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allostery plays a critical role in protein dynamics and is essential for many biological functions. Over the past decade, various computational approaches have been proposed for predicting allosteric sites. However, the strengths and weaknesses of each method are not well understood. In this study, we created two independent datasets that had not been used in selected computational protocols: a CAPASP-General subset comprising holo state allosteric proteins and a CAPASP-Unbound subset comprising apo state allosteric proteins. We then systematically evaluated the accuracy of five allosteric site prediction tools across five dimensions: sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, MCC value and ranking capability. The results indicated that the machine learning models PASSer and APOP, which are based on protein physicochemical properties, not only achieved the highest success rate in sensitivity prediction but also lead in average F1-score and MCC value. However, these models performed better with the CAPASP-General subset than with the CAPASP-Unbound subset, suggesting that the prediction models require further improvement. These findings could facilitate the selection of appropriate prediction models for different allosteric proteins and enhance our understanding of protein function and regulatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

Allosteric SiteComputational BiologyProteinsAllosteric RegulationDatabases, ProteinMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsProteinsAllosteric siteDrug discoveryMachine learningProtein flexibilitySensitivity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.