ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2026
A biophysically grounded model of glutamatergic synaptic transmission integrating glutamate transport, receptor kinetics, and electrotonic effects.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gluatamatergic synaptic transmission, critical for learning and memory, relies on precise regulation of extracellular glutamate levels by astrocytic transporters, particularly EAAT2. While existing models of AMPA and NMDA receptor kinetics often oversimplify glutamate dynamics or become computationally intractable, this study develops a balanced, biophysically grounded model that integrates glutamate transport, receptor sensitivity, and electrotonic effects. Using rat hippocampal slices, we recorded postsynaptic currents in CA1 pyramidal neurons under control conditions and during glutamate transporter blockade. The proposed mathematical model, formulated as a system of seven ordinary differential equations, distinguishes somatic and dendritic compartments, synaptic plasticity, and differential glutamate sensitivity of AMPA and NMDA receptors. Key findings reveal that the glutamate transporter blockade prolongs NMDA receptor-mediated currents without altering AMPA receptor kinetics, consistent with the higher glutamate sensitivity of NMDA receptors. The model also predicts glutamate concentrations in synaptic and extrasynaptic spaces, offering insights into spatial neurotransmitter dynamics. Furthermore, it accounts for voltage-dependent NMDA responses and short-term plasticity observed experimentally. By bridging the gap between oversimplified and overly complex approaches, this work provides a versatile tool for studying synaptic transmission in normal and pathological conditions, such as epilepsy or neurodegenerative diseases, where glutamate dysregulation plays a central role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.