ArticleArchives of women's mental health2026
Receipt of reproductive safety data among pregnant marijuana users and nonusers.
Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePregnant patients were surveyed to determine marijuana use, their interest in additional education of the risks marijuana use in pregnancy, and if they had been educated by their providers about these.
methodsFisher's exact tests were used to determine significant differences in both demographics and survey answers on provider education between those who used and did not use marijuana during pregnancy.
results409 patients were surveyed with 367 completing the survey. 87 participants (23.7%) of those surveyed endorsed marijuana use in their current pregnancy. Significant differences between those who used marijuana and those who did not were seen in race/ethnicity (17.1% among White people versus 38.9% among those of other race/ethnicity; p = 0.017), age (with 33.3% of 18-24 year olds reporting the highest use vs. 0.0% of ≥ 40 year olds reporting the lowest use; p = 0.014) and education level (with those who had not completed high school reporting the highest rates of use, p = 0.001). 15.3% of all respondents received counseling on the risks of marijuana use during pregnancy. Among those who used marijuana, 25.3% received the counseling, compared to 12.1% of those who did not use (p = 0.003). 41.4% of those who used marijuana expressed an interest in additional information on this topic, significantly higher than those who did not use (p < 0.001).
conclusionA gap exists in the area, as only 25%of pregnant patients who used marijuana reported receiving counseling, compared to the 41% who stated a desire for additional information. This emphasizes the need for both accessible resources on how marijuana affects both the pregnant mother and infant, as well as education for providers on this gap in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.