Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126431›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2026

Choosing wisely in neuroradiology: evaluating CT and MR utilization trends in Europe.

Conor Brosnan, Andrea Rossi, Anouk van der Hoorn, Paulina Due-Tønnessen, Seamus Looby, ESNR Choosing Wisely Committee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Conor BrosnanDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. conorbrosnan@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-5164
Andrea RossiNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Anouk van der HoornDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paulina Due-TønnessenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Seamus LoobyDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
ESNR Choosing Wisely Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess trends in volume and utilization of neuroimaging (CT and MR) across Europe over the last decade, within the context of evolving clinical practice on behalf of the European Society of Neuroradiology's Choosing Wisely committee. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic search of PubMed was performed (following PRISMA 2020 guidelines) to identify studies reporting European neuroimaging volumes. As no eligible studies were identified, descriptive analysis of Eurostat and OECD data was performed for 29 European countries from 2015 to 2022, covering CT and MR examination volumes and scanner availability per 100,000 population across four geographic regions (Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Europe). Total CT/MR volumes served as neuroimaging surrogates.

results316 publications were identified (with none meeting predefined inclusion criteria). Eurostat data from 29 countries revealed substantial growth in imaging from 2015 to 2022. Per capita CT exam rates increased 40.8% (10,872 to 15,312 per 100,000 population), and MR scan rates increased 43.5% (5746 to 8244 per 100,000 population). Scanner availability also increased (CT scanners from 2.3 to 2.68, MR scanners from 1.43 to 2.11 per 100,000 population). Regional variations were evident: Western Europe showed the highest utilization rates, Eastern Europe demonstrated the largest relative growth despite lower absolute numbers. All regions experienced consistent growth except during the 2020 COVID-19 disruptions.

conclusionNeuroimaging utilization has substantially increased across Europe from 2015 to 2022, with disproportionate growth in scan volumes relative to scanner availability. These findings highlight regional disparities in utilization and underscore the need for coordinated evidence-based appropriateness initiatives to support sustainable neuroimaging practice. KEY POINTS: Question Have CT and MR neuroimaging utilization rates changed across Europe over the last decade compared to scanner availability? Findings CT and MR scan rates increased 40.8% and 43.5%, respectively, from 2015 to 2022, reflecting increased per-scanner utilization across the continent. Clinical relevance Neuroimaging examination volumes increased substantially across Europe from 2015 to 2022. This highlights the value of evidence-based imaging appropriateness initiatives to ensure sustainable healthcare resource utilization.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedEuropeHumansEuropeMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingTomography (X-ray computed)Utilization

Identifiers

PMID42126431
PMCPMC13342327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.