ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2026
ECG Signatures and Long-Term Ischemic Stroke Risk: A Deep Learning Analysis of 200,000 Patients.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScalable risk stratification for ischemic stroke remains an unmet need.
objectivesIn this study, the authors sought to assess whether deep learning of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can estimate longitudinal ischemic stroke risk and quantify the extent to which risk signals reflect plausible mechanisms (eg, atrial cardiopathy).
methodsWe trained a convolutional neural network to estimate the 10-year risk of incident ischemic stroke with the use of 12-lead ECG among patients receiving longitudinal care at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Neural network-derived stroke probabilities, age, and sex were integrated into a Cox proportional hazards model ("ECG2Stroke"). Within an MGH test set ("MGH Test"), as well as independent samples from Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), we assessed model discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration (integrated calibration index [ICI]). ECG2Stroke was compared with the revised Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP). Saliency mapping, associations with clinical factors and structured ECG features, and performance across stroke subtypes were assessed.
resultsECG2Stroke was developed in 101,496 individuals from MGH (age 57 ± 16 years, 48% women), and evaluated in MGH Test (n = 4,771; age 57 ± 16 years, 49% women), BWH (n = 68,884; age 57 ± 16 years, 55% women), and BIDMC (n = 29,882; age 56 ± 17 years, 54% women). At 10 years, there were 346 stroke events in MGH Test, 3,209 in BWH, and 1,236 in BIDMC. ECG2Stroke demonstrated moderate discrimination of incident stroke (10-year AUCs: MGH Test, 0.795; BWH, 0.774; BIDMC, 0.772) and low calibration error (ICIs: MGH Test, 0.030; BWH, 0.005; BIDMC, 0.026). In patients with available data, 10-year AUC for ECG2Stroke was similar to FSRP (MGH/BWH Test: ECG2Stroke, 0.791; FSRP, 0.779; BIDMC: ECG2Stroke, 0.745; FSRP, 0.728). Stratification persisted across subgroups, including patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Saliency maps highlighted the ECG P-wave, and risk estimates correlated with structured P-wave indices. ECG2Stroke was strongly associated with cardioembolic stroke (cause-specific HR: 2.17 per 1-SD of logit-transformed probability; 95% CI: 1.64-2.87) but not noncardioembolic stroke.
conclusionsECG-based artificial intelligence (AI) can predict 10-year ischemic stroke with performance similar to a validated clinical score, possibly by encoding markers of abnormal atrial substrate linked to cardioembolism. AI-enabled ECG analysis may enable efficient prioritization for stroke prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.