ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Effect of perceived distance to health facility on antenatal care service use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do socio-demographic characteristics modify these associations?
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough perceived distance is a key factor in deciding and reaching healthcare, its impact on antenatal care (ANC) utilisation remains underexplored.ObjectiveThis study aims to examine the effect of perceived distance on ANC uptake, stratified by key maternal characteristics.DesignCross-sectional analysis based on demographic and health survey data (DHS).MethodsThis study analysed the demographic and health survey data of 26 sub-Saharan African countries, comprising 186,873 women who had given birth within the five years preceding the surveys. The exposure variable was perceived distance to a healthcare facility, categorised as "a big problem" or "not a big problem." Whereas the outcome variable was the number of ANC contacts, classified as no, one to three, four to seven and eight or more contacts. A Generalised Structural Equation Model (GSEM) with a multinomial logit link was employed to examine the association. Analyses were further stratified by socio-demographic characteristics.ResultsThe analysis revealed that women who perceived the distance as a major problem had 15% higher odds of receiving only 1-3 contacts (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25, p = 0.002), and 51% higher odds of receiving no ANC (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.66, p < 0.001), compared to those receiving eight or more contacts. These associations were particularly pronounced among women with lower educational status (aOR=1.48, 95%CI: 1.29, 1.64), rural residents (aOR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.37, 1.74), low household income (aOR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.27,1.68), and younger age (aOR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.31, 1.80).ConclusionPerceived distance remains a significant barrier to the utilisation of antenatal care services in resource-limited settings. Strengthening health system responsiveness and addressing structural barriers, such as transportation infrastructures, through innovations like mobile antenatal care is vital to improving maternal health outcomes and advancing global health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.