Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126277›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2026

Orthodontic Patients' Motivation and Decision-Making for Seeking Treatment With Traditional Fixed Appliances, Clear Aligners and Direct-To-Consumer Clear Aligners: A Qualitative Study-Part I.

Sherry Lee, Ben Daniel, Li Mei, Mauro Farella, Fiona A Firth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sherry LeeDepartment of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Ben DanielCentre for Teaching, Learning and Technology (CTLT), University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Li MeiDepartment of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-8091
Mauro FarellaDepartment of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-647X
Fiona A FirthDepartment of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-0915

Funding

New Zealand Dental Research Foundation RF8.20 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQualitative data helps explore factors surrounding patients' decisions with orthodontic treatment. The objectives were (1) to understand patients' motivation to undertake orthodontic treatment, (2) to understand their choices of a specific treatment modality, and (3) to determine the kinds of information provided to patients prior to receiving treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was an exploratory case study design. Thirty adults who completed orthodontic treatment with three different treatment modalities within the last twelve months in New Zealand were recruited. Patients undergoing treatment and those who had orthognathic surgery were excluded. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted. The transcripts were analysed with NVivo software using a qualitative thematic analysis inductive approach.

resultsThree principal themes were identified in the data: Motivation for orthodontic treatment, the decision for treatment with a specific treatment modality, and patient information and education. Self-consciousness, aesthetics, relapse of previous orthodontic treatment, cleanability, and a previous financial barrier to seeking orthodontic treatment were motivating factors. Patients opted for traditional fixed appliances due to recommendation and trust; clear aligners due to age, working environment, and aesthetics; and direct-to-consumer clear aligners due to low cost. All participants had little knowledge about orthodontics prior to commencing treatment, and the provision of information for informed consent was not equal for each of the three groups.

conclusionThe primary motivators of individuals seeking treatment were self-consciousness, aesthetics, and previous financial constraints. Cost had the most significant impact when selecting a specific treatment modality.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMotivationOrthodontic Appliances, FixedOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableOrthodontics, CorrectivePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandQualitative ResearchYoung Adultclear alignersdecisiondirect‐to‐consumerfixed appliancesmotivationorthodontic treatment

Identifiers

PMID42126277
PMCPMC13485219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.