Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126185›Full record

ReviewExperimental dermatology2026

CD24 in Melanoma: Biomarker, Innate Immune Checkpoint and Emerging Therapeutic Target.

Claudia Lasalle, Rachel C Chang, Nicole C Nowak, Yulu Wang, Alessio Giubellino, Kyle T Amber, Adrian P Mansini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia LasalleDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8815-8569
Rachel C ChangDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-6926
Nicole C NowakDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9796-7767
Yulu WangDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1701-6304
Alessio GiubellinoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kyle T AmberDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-2454
Adrian P MansiniDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0857-0556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment of advanced melanoma, yet many patients develop primary or acquired resistance. Although most work has focused on adaptive checkpoints (PD-1 and CTLA-4), accumulating evidence implicates innate immune suppression and stem-like, drug-resistant melanoma cell states. CD24, a small, heavily glycosylated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored surface protein, sits at the intersection of these processes and is emerging as a context-dependent biomarker and potential mediator of aggressive, therapy-resistant melanoma states. In this review, we synthesize evidence indicating that CD24 is both a tumour-intrinsic and tumour-extrinsic regulator in melanoma. We summarize the structure, glycosylation and regulation of CD24, then discuss its role in melanoma, supporting phenotypic plasticity, sustaining stem-like populations and promoting resistance to BRAF-targeted and cytotoxic therapies through SOX2/STAT3-linked programmes. We then examine the CD24-Siglec-10 axis as an innate immune checkpoint that suppresses macrophage and dendritic cell function, promotes immune-excluded 'cold' tumour microenvironments and may shape responses to immunotherapy among CD24+ melanoma cells. We highlight CD24 in tumour tissue, blood and extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers of prognosis and pathway activity, and review CD24-axis interventions, including anti-CD24 antibodies, Siglec-10 antagonists and CD24-targeted CAR-T/CAR-NK cells, with rational combinations alongside PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade and MAPK-targeted therapy. We propose that biomarker-driven trials targeting this axis could open a new front in melanoma immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCD24immune evasioninnate immune checkpointmelanomaSiglec‐10tumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42126185
PMCPMC13170416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.