Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126126›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Health and economic impact of universal screening and management of alcohol use disorders in India: An economic modelling study.

Neha Purohit, Shubhmohan Singh, Atul Ambekar, Ajay Duseja, Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Girish N Rao, Kathirvel Soundappan, Atul Kotwal, Shankar Prinja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neha PurohitDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Shubhmohan SinghDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Atul AmbekarNational Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7741
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Ashwani Kumar MishraNational Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Girish N RaoCentre for Public Health, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Kathirvel SoundappanDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Atul KotwalNational Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, India.
Shankar PrinjaDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-6986

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-064844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe study assessed the health and economic implications as well as the cost-utility of implementing universal alcohol use disorder (AUD) screening in 15-74 years population at the primary healthcare level compared with the current practice of diagnosis and management of symptomatic AUD patients seeking formal healthcare.

designModel-based cost-utility analysis using a hybrid model comprising a decision tree and lifetime age- and gender-specific Markov models for alcohol attributable conditions, including road traffic accident injuries, alcohol-related liver disease and head and neck cancers. The analysis was undertaken from both an abridged societal (consideration of direct cost of care) and a societal (consideration of direct and indirect costs) perspective.

settingIndia (national and sub-national level analysis).

participants15-74 years population segregated by gender. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATORS: The intervention was 10-year annual population-based screening for alcohol use disorders using alcohol use disorder identification test by community health workers at primary care facilities. The comparator was 'usual care' scenario of diagnosis and management of symptomatic AUD patients, considering care seeking patterns in India. MEASUREMENTS: Differences in life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), alcohol attributable deaths and morbidities, direct costs and indirect costs in the comparative scenarios, along with incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), benefit-cost ratio and net monetary benefit. ICUR was evaluated using the per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) threshold of ₹171 498 (US$2182), as per Indian economic evaluation guidelines. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the parameters that are likely to have an impact on efficiency of the screening programme.

findingsThe AUD universal screening programme was associated with a gain of 71.16 million QALYs at population level, with approximately one-fourth reduction in the incidence of alcohol-attributable conditions. The ICUR value indicated that the programme is likely to be cost-effective from an abridged societal perspective. The intervention is projected to generate a gain of ₹8.21 (US$1.03) trillion, equivalent to per year gain of 0.59% of GDP, based on the abridged societal perspective. The deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that reductions in diagnostic accuracy of the screening method, prevalence of AUD and treatment coverage had an inverse impact on the ICURs and could impact efficiency of the programme.

conclusionThere is good health and economic evidence to support the integration of alcohol use disorder screening and management within routine primary care. It would be essential to deploy measures for effectiveness of the screening tool and continuity of care to enhance efficiency of the programme.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAlcohol-Related DisordersHealth Care CostsMass ScreeningModels, EconomicAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaalcohol‐related liver diseasealcohol use disorderscost‐effectivenesseconomic evaluationhead and neck cancersprimary health careroad traffic accidentsscreening

Identifiers

PMID42126126
PMCPMC13486922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.