ReviewLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026
From Theory to Practice: Which Biomarkers Are Ready for Predicting Response in Advanced HCC?
Review in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Theory to Practice: Which Biomarkers Are Ready for Predicting Response in Advanced HCC?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have expanded considerably with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunotherapy-anti-angiogenic combinations. However, despite this therapeutic diversification, first-line treatment selection remains largely empirical, as few biomarkers are available at diagnosis to inform therapeutic choice. This review provides a practice-oriented synthesis of predictive biomarkers evaluated in advanced HCC, distinguishing those that are clinically transposable from those that remain exploratory. Among currently available tools, only a limited set of biomarkers demonstrates sufficient robustness and feasibility for real-world use, and most provide information after treatment initiation rather than guiding upfront selection. Liver function assessment (ALBI score), dynamic Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) kinetics and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) emerge as the most actionable parameters. ALBI retains predominantly prognostic value, whereas early AFP decline and ADA formation offer treatment-specific, on-treatment insights that may support clinical decision-making. Imaging biomarkers such as mRECIST remain essential for early efficacy assessment but lack predictive value at baseline. Routine histological markers-including PD-L1, mismatch repair proteins and β-catenin immunostaining-do not reliably predict response prior to therapy initiation. In contrast, a broad range of circulating, tissue-based and imaging-derived biomarkers-including liquid biopsy analytes (cytokines, CTCs, ctDNA, miRNAs), transcriptomic immune signatures, artificial intelligence AI-assisted histopathology, radiomics and multi-omic tumour profiling-provide substantial mechanistic insight but remain investigational. Their limited clinical applicability reflects methodological heterogeneity, insufficient standardisation and the absence of prospective validation in biomarker-driven trials. Among emerging approaches, proteomics stands out as a particularly promising strategy. By directly capturing the protein expression landscape of the tumour and its microenvironment, proteomics may overcome the inferential limitations of genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers and contribute to the development of biologically grounded, pre-treatment stratification tools in advanced HCC. Ultimately, this review underscores a critical unmet need: the development of integrated, multi-omic predictive strategies that combine baseline tissue characteristics with dynamic liquid biopsy markers and advanced imaging. Such approaches, strengthened by AI and prospective biomarker-driven trials, are essential to move beyond empirical therapy selection and toward true precision medicine in advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.