Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126007›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Barn owls exert top-down effects on the abundance and behavior of rodent pests.

Katherine C Larson, Roger A Baldwin, Matthew D Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Barn owls exert top-down effects on the abundance and behavior of rodent pests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine C LarsonDepartment of Wildlife, Cal Poly Humboldt, Arcata, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6036-6280
Roger A BaldwinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Matthew D JohnsonDepartment of Wildlife, Cal Poly Humboldt, Arcata, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-2824

Funding

Agricultural Research Institute, California State University S4576U.S. Department of Agriculture 21-137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predators can exert top-down effects on their prey by direct consumption, by imposing risk of predation, or a combination of both. However, empirical evidence for these effects is mixed and inconsistent. Barn owls in agriculture present a system with attributes that should, according to theory, lead to strong top-down effects, but research is limited and the distinction between effects on prey abundance and behavior remains unresolved. Understanding the top-down effect of predators on pests is a cornerstone of integrated pest management and important where barn owls may contribute to the control of rodents on farms. Vegetation can mediate the top-down effects of predators on prey, but this has received little attention for barn owls and rodent pests, limiting the information farmers can use to manage their fields to harness the effect of barn owls. To fill these gaps, we surveyed aboveground foraging rodents and monitored barn owl nest boxes at six winegrape vineyards in Napa Valley, California, from February to July in 2023. We deployed chew block grids to determine the effect of barn owls on rodent abundance and used giving-up density (GUD) trays and camera traps to determine the effect of barn owls on rodent perceived predation risk and activity, respectively. We found that, over the range of hunting pressures observed (from nearly no owls to about three occupied boxes with six adults and eight chicks within a 1-km radius), barn owls reduced rodent (predominantly deer mouse, Peromyscus spp.) abundance by 38%-52% and increased perceived predation risk by 16%-38%. Results also suggest that vegetation cover favors the acoustically attuned barn owls over the visually oriented rodent pests. These results contribute to growing evidence that barn owls can be used as biological control in agricultural systems and that vegetation can be managed to optimize their impact. We advise that growers maintain the vine canopy of leaves, pruned twigs on the ground, and vegetation cover in a cover crop row grown between vine rows to elevate perceived predation risk in mice. We also recommend that, to the extent feasible, farmers time mowing to reduce mouse activity when crops are vulnerable.

Indexed as

Food ChainPredatory BehaviorRodentiaStrigiformesAnimalsCaliforniaPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsAmerican Barn Owlchew blocksgiving‐up densityintegrated pest managementoptimal foraging theoryphrases agriculturepredator–prey dynamicsrodenttop‐downwinegrape vineyard

Identifiers

PMID42126007
PMCPMC13170055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.