ReviewEuropean journal of ophthalmology2026
Risk factors and pathophysiological insights into optic neuropathy after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A literature review.
Review in European journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optic neuropathy is an underrecognised but vision-threatening complication following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, even when anatomical success is achieved. Several mechanisms have been implicated, including intraoperative light toxicity, mechanical stress on the optic nerve, postoperative elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP), and reduced ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). Tamponade agents such as silicone oil and expansile gases may further contribute to IOP spikes and ischaemic optic nerve injury. Systemic factors, including diabetes, hypertension, and hypercoagulability, can impair vascular autoregulation, increasing susceptibility to ischaemia. Although optical coherence tomography (OCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect early structural or functional injury, standardised diagnostic and preventive approaches remain limited. In this narrative review, we evaluated evidence from case reports, small case series, retrospective cohort, and case-control studies to outline the incidence, risk factors, and proposed pathophysiological mechanisms of post-RRD optic neuropathy. We also highlight areas of controversy, including the relative contribution of pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle and the potential neurotoxicity of silicone oil, and we discuss the strength of evidence supporting each risk factor. Defining high-risk patients, optimising perioperative IOP control, and evaluating neuroprotective and monitoring strategies represent key priorities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42125905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.