ArticleTrends in hearing
The Effect of Deep Neural Network Implementation on Speech Recognition, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality in Older Adults With Mild to Moderately Severe Hearing Loss.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural network (DNN)-based noise reduction has emerged as a promising advancement in hearing aid signal processing as a means to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments for hearing aid wearers. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the DNN on speech intelligibility in speech-shaped noise (SSN) and multitalker babble (MTB) when the target speech was coming from the front and from the side. Subjective ratings of clarity, total impression, listening effort, and background noise awareness were also collected. Twenty adult participants with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids from a single manufacturer, programmed with four different settings that varied across combinations of microphone directionality (omnidirectional and directional beamforming) and noise reduction (off, traditional, DNN). Results showed that DNN, when combined with beamforming, consistently outperformed the other programs across all metrics. Outcomes were influenced by both noise type and spatial configuration. DNN was more effective in SSN than MTB. Beamforming was especially beneficial when the target speech came from the front. Listening in programs that included both DNN and beamforming together resulted in additional benefits shown in the outcome measures, most likely due to the beamforming improving the signal-to-noise ratio and providing a cleaner signal for the DNN to work with.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.