Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125824›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

The Effect of Deep Neural Network Implementation on Speech Recognition, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality in Older Adults With Mild to Moderately Severe Hearing Loss.

Paula Folkeard, Vahid Ashkanichenarlogh, Mohamed Rahme, Vijay Parsa, Volker Kühnel, Bilal Sheikh, Jinyu Qian, Yu-Ying Sung, Susan Scollie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paula FolkeardNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-6730
Vahid AshkanichenarloghNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.
Mohamed RahmeNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-2865
Vijay ParsaNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.
Volker KühnelDepartment of Research and Development, Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
Bilal SheikhDepartment of Research and Development, Sonova Canada Inc., Kitchener, Canada.
Jinyu QianDepartment of Research and Development, Sonova Canada Inc., Kitchener, Canada.
Yu-Ying SungNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-8238-9521
Susan ScollieNational Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-5279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural network (DNN)-based noise reduction has emerged as a promising advancement in hearing aid signal processing as a means to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments for hearing aid wearers. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the DNN on speech intelligibility in speech-shaped noise (SSN) and multitalker babble (MTB) when the target speech was coming from the front and from the side. Subjective ratings of clarity, total impression, listening effort, and background noise awareness were also collected. Twenty adult participants with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids from a single manufacturer, programmed with four different settings that varied across combinations of microphone directionality (omnidirectional and directional beamforming) and noise reduction (off, traditional, DNN). Results showed that DNN, when combined with beamforming, consistently outperformed the other programs across all metrics. Outcomes were influenced by both noise type and spatial configuration. DNN was more effective in SSN than MTB. Beamforming was especially beneficial when the target speech came from the front. Listening in programs that included both DNN and beamforming together resulted in additional benefits shown in the outcome measures, most likely due to the beamforming improving the signal-to-noise ratio and providing a cleaner signal for the DNN to work with.

Indexed as

Correction of Hearing ImpairmentDeep LearningHearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralNeural Networks, ComputerSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual Maskingdeep neural networksdenoisinglistening effortmachine learningsound qualityspeech-in-noise

Identifiers

PMID42125824
PMCPMC13180067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.