ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Essential embryology for the Canadian pathologists' assistant.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathologists' assistants (PAs) are pivotal in healthcare, conducting autopsies and examining tissues under a pathologist's guidance. Embryology knowledge is crucial for PAs to accurately assess anomalies and identify pathologies. Yet, it is often overlooked in academic PA training programs. Given the cognitive demands on students and limited curricular time, integrating embryology requires the identification of vocationally relevant topics. This study sought to determine essential embryology learning objectives (LOs) for PAs by consulting practicing PAs and pathologists. Beginning with an initial list of 85 LOs across 16 embryology content themes, practicing PAs and pathologists rated how essential each LO is to professional practice via an online survey. The Lawshe content validity method quantified consensus, with results stratified by stakeholder group characteristics. The survey, distributed via various networks, had 115 respondents (PAs = 102) from across Canada (61% from Ontario), with diverse academic backgrounds. Fifteen LOs were identified as statistically essential, covering numerous embryology content themes including terminology, neurulation, placenta/fetal membranes, and cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and urinary systems. PAs expected more of themselves compared to pathologists (LOs = 14 vs LOs = 6), with additional discrepancies among PA service cohorts and those with differing years of experience and types of training. This research has, for the first time, identified the essential embryology learning objectives specific to the PA profession, revealing differences in knowledge expectations among relevant professional stakeholders. The final list of 15 essential learning objectives can be immediately leveraged to design streamlined embryology curricula that meet vocational relevance across PA training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.