ArticleBiomedical reports2026
Comprehensive clinicopathological evaluation of malignant localized gingival enlargements in the Thai population.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant localized gingival enlargements (LGEs) are rare and often clinically mimic reactive or benign lesions, creating diagnostic challenges. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and origins of malignant LGEs, assess clinicopathological diagnostic concordance, and identify the distinction of clinical features in a Thai population. A total of 96 malignant LGEs diagnosed over a 40-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and clinical and pathological diagnoses were collected. Malignant LGEs were categorized by origin, and diagnostic concordance was evaluated. Clinical features were compared between epithelial and non-epithelial malignant LGEs, and a decision tree model was constructed to identify predictive factors. Epithelial (60.4%) and non-epithelial (39.6%) malignant LGEs indicated a comparable distribution. Non-epithelial lesions demonstrated substantially lower diagnostic concordance and were frequently misdiagnosed as reactive or benign conditions. Significant differences between groups were observed in age (P=0.004), surface texture (P=0.003), color (P=0.014), and location (P=0.044). Decision tree analysis identified age (P=0.018) and surface texture (P=0.03) as key predictors of non-epithelial malignant LGEs. Non-epithelial malignant LGEs are particularly prone to clinical misdiagnosis. Lesions occurring in younger patients, notably those with smooth surface texture, should raise suspicion for non-epithelial malignancy and prompt timely biopsy and referral. These findings may aid clinicians in improving early recognition of malignant LGEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.