ArticleEvolutionary applications2026
Coexisting Atlantic Cod Ecotypes in the Barents Sea: An Issue for Managing Fisheries.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The largest remaining cod stock in the Atlantic, the Northeast Arctic cod (NEAC), is facing climate change and poor recruitment. It is currently assumed to represent a single biological population. In coastal waters, both in Northern Norway and down to mid-Norway during the spawning season, NEAC overlaps with another cod ecotype, the conspecific coastal cod (CC), which is managed as a separate stock. Here, we analysed otoliths and conducted genotyping of 3900 cod to investigate population structure and potential ecotype mixtures in the Barents Sea. The annual surveys cover both the spawning and feeding areas of the NEAC stock with the purpose of collecting data for the annual stock assessment. While classification of individual cod to population-of-origin with the genetic markers currently available remains challenging, we-for the first time-infer the presence of CC and potential NEAC × CC hybrids also far offshore in the Barents Sea. Moreover, the CC were not homogenously distributed in the Barents Sea, but were higher in the west (including Svalbard) and in the far east, as well as near the Norwegian coast. Most of these putatively identified CC fish carried NEAC-type otoliths. Thus, cod otolith type seems a poor indicator of genetic ancestry and instead reflects environmental conditions. Many questions remain on the temporal stability of the NEAC and CC mixing in the Barents Sea, and not least, the management implications of such stock mixing. More generally, further studies are needed on the connection between within-species genetic differences and the implications of such differences for stock dynamics in a management context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.