ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
Research Gaps and Priorities for aHUS in the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC): Findings from a Payer-Focused Expert Meeting.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, life-threatening complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) associated with high morbidity, mortality, and substantial healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Although complement inhibitors such as eculizumab and ravulizumab have dramatically improved outcomes, aHUS continues to impose significant economic and operational burden on healthcare systems. In the Gulf region, payers and health systems face increasing pressures driven by rising costs, delayed diagnosis, fragmented access, and limited real-world evidence necessary for informed resource allocation decisions. This manuscript summarizes the findings of a payer-focused regional expert meeting, which included three presentations: (1) the role and value of HCRU studies for payers, (2) the clinical and economic burden of aHUS, and (3) existing global evidence on HCRU in aHUS and gaps relevant to the Gulf. The meeting concluded with an expert panel discussion and a survey assessing feasibility and priorities for a collaborative real-world study. Consensus highlighted urgent needs to establish regional incidence and prevalence, quantify utilization and cost burden, evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes, and design a standardized multicenter study. Priority research directions include retrospective chart review with prospective follow-up and unified data collection across Gulf institutions. These findings provide a payer-informed roadmap for building evidence that can support sustainable, equitable, and value-based decision making for aHUS care in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.