ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Determinants of bystander removal attempts in witnessed foreign body airway obstruction: a prospective nationwide multicenter observational study from the MOCHI registry.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foreign body airway obstruction (FBAO) is a time-critical emergency. Although bystander removal maneuvers can improve outcomes, they are not consistently attempted even when events are witnessed. We aimed to identify patient-, witness-, and setting-related factors associated with the absence of bystander removal attempts in witnessed FBAO. Methods: We analyzed a prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort from the MOCHI registry in Japan, including patients with witnessed FBAO. The primary outcome was absence of a bystander removal attempt. Multivariable logistic regression with multiple imputation for missing data was used to examine associations with patient age, sex, eating function, location (home, care facility, public), and witness/bystander age and sex. Results: Among 325 witnessed FBAO events, 193 (59%) involved a removal attempt and 132 (41%) did not. The median patient age was 81 years. Attempt rates varied by location: 82% in care facilities, 52% at home, 43% in public places. Witnesses/bystanders were significantly older in events without an attempt (median 60 vs. 50 years). Older witness/bystander age was independently associated with higher odds of no attempt (OR 1.39 per 10-year increase; 95% CI 1.14-1.70). Compared with home, no attempt was less frequent in care facilities (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.20-0.93) and more frequent in public places (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.10). Conclusions: In witnessed FBAO, removal attempts were less likely when witnesses were older and when events occurred in public places. These findings may help inform age-tailored and setting-specific first-aid strategies to increase bystander intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.