Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125724›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Blood biomarker outliers and clinical events during intensive care in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Pia Koivikko, Jussi P Posti, Iftakher Hossain, Mehrbod Mohammadian, Olli Tenovuo, Peter Hutchinson, Ari J Katila, Henna-Riikka Maanpää, David K Menon, Virginia F Newcombe and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pia KoivikkoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jussi P PostiTurku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
Iftakher HossainTurku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
Mehrbod MohammadianTurku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
Olli TenovuoTurku Brain Injury Center, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
Peter HutchinsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ari J KatilaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Henna-Riikka MaanpääNeurocenter, Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
David K MenonPerioperative, Acute, Critical, and Emergency Care (PACE) Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Virginia F NewcombePerioperative, Acute, Critical, and Emergency Care (PACE) Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jean-Charles SanchezDepartment of Specialities of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1 Michel Servet, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jussi TallusClinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Hämeentie 11, FI20521, Turku, Finland.
Mark van GilsFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Kalevantie 4, FI33100, Tampere, Finland.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, S-431 80, Molndal, Sweden.
Riikka Sk TakalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Monitoring and timely clinical assessment are fundamental to treating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Proactive, individualised treatment is unavailable with the current methods. Research question: How do outlying blood biomarker levels associate with clinical events or outcome in TBI? Materials and methods: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and total tau (t-tau) were analysed from blood plasma samples of 70 ICU-treated patients, aged ≥18, with a clinical diagnosis of TBI and an indication for a head CT scan. The blood samples were collected on arrival and on days 1, 2, 3 and 7. The biomarkers were screened for outliers and biomarker values outside Q1-1.5 × interquartile range (IQR) or Q3+1.5 × IQR on any day post-injury were considered outliers. The outlier group was compared with the non-outlier group targeting clinically significant aspects such as high intracranial pressure, seizures/status epilepticus, or mortality/poor outcome. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was evaluated between 6 and 12 months after the injury. Results: Difference was found in epileptic activity (n = 7 vs n = 0) and the number of performed decompressive hemicraniectomies (n = 6 vs n = 0) between the outlier and the non-outlier groups, p = 0.015 and < 0.0001, respectively. Patients in the outlier group were also more likely to have a poor outcome (GOSE 1-3) than patients in the non-outlier group, p = 0.011. Discussion and conclusion: Biomarker outliers seem to associate with clinical events and poor outcome in ICU-treated patients with TBI, possibly due to greater severity of TBI.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComplicationsOutcomeOutliersTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42125724
PMCPMC13158617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.