ArticleBrain & spine2026
Blood biomarker outliers and clinical events during intensive care in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring and timely clinical assessment are fundamental to treating patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Proactive, individualised treatment is unavailable with the current methods. Research question: How do outlying blood biomarker levels associate with clinical events or outcome in TBI? Materials and methods: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and total tau (t-tau) were analysed from blood plasma samples of 70 ICU-treated patients, aged ≥18, with a clinical diagnosis of TBI and an indication for a head CT scan. The blood samples were collected on arrival and on days 1, 2, 3 and 7. The biomarkers were screened for outliers and biomarker values outside Q1-1.5 × interquartile range (IQR) or Q3+1.5 × IQR on any day post-injury were considered outliers. The outlier group was compared with the non-outlier group targeting clinically significant aspects such as high intracranial pressure, seizures/status epilepticus, or mortality/poor outcome. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was evaluated between 6 and 12 months after the injury. Results: Difference was found in epileptic activity (n = 7 vs n = 0) and the number of performed decompressive hemicraniectomies (n = 6 vs n = 0) between the outlier and the non-outlier groups, p = 0.015 and < 0.0001, respectively. Patients in the outlier group were also more likely to have a poor outcome (GOSE 1-3) than patients in the non-outlier group, p = 0.011. Discussion and conclusion: Biomarker outliers seem to associate with clinical events and poor outcome in ICU-treated patients with TBI, possibly due to greater severity of TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.