ArticleBrain & spine2026
Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure risk around the thoracolumbar junction: Impact of anterior malalignment, pelvic retroversion, and upper instrumented level selection.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/PJF) remains a frequent and severe complication following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. While alignment risk factors are known, the specific mechanical influence of anterior malalignment and pelvic retroversion across different fusion levels remains poorly understood. Research question: How do postoperative anterior malalignment and pelvic retroversion influence PJK/PJF risk and biomechanical forces at the proximal junction based on upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) selection? Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 351 ASD patients fused to the pelvis, stratified by UIV: lower thoracic (LT, T9-T11; n = 206) or upper lumbar (UL, T12-L2; n = 145). Radiographic spinopelvic alignment was evaluated. Additionally, a validated finite element model (FEM) of T10-pelvis and L2-pelvis constructs simulated progressive anterior offsets and pelvic retroversion to quantify UIV endplate compressive and shear forces. Results: PJK/PJF incidence was comparable between groups (LT: 22.4%, UL: 22.2%). In both cohorts, PJK patients exhibited greater 6-week postoperative global sagittal malalignment and pelvic retroversion. LT failures were driven by higher SVA and thoracic kyphosis, whereas UL failures associated with increased segmental T10-L2 kyphosis. FEM showed LT constructs experienced predominant compressive forces scaling with anterior offset, while UL constructs experienced predominant posterior shear forces. Pelvic retroversion offered negligible mitigation against compression and limited shear reduction. Discussion and conclusion: UIV selection dictates the biomechanical failure mechanism, not the overall PJK/PJF risk. LT instrumentation exposes the proximal junction to compression, whereas the UL spine is susceptible to shear-driven failure. Pelvic retroversion cannot compensate for residual anterior malalignment. Therefore, UIV choice must account for regional alignment and predictable force vectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.