ArticleAJPM focus2026
Understanding Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Quality Improvement Project in the HIV Clinics at Dartmouth Health.
Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People living with HIV are at increased risk for human papillomavirus infection, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer, with current guidelines recommending regular cervical cancer screening for this population. At Dartmouth Health HIV clinics, 37 patients were identified as overdue for screening. To explore potential barriers, the authors conducted interviews with 24 of these patients. Most interviewees had previously undergone cervical cancer screening and felt confident in their understanding of its importance. However, several barriers to timely screening emerged. The most commonly reported challenges included being too busy, fear of pain, and the belief that screening was not necessary in the absence of symptoms. Other discouraging factors included prior negative experiences and lack of transportation. Despite these barriers, 11 patients expressed interest in learning more about cervical cancer screening, and 11 were open to staff assistance in scheduling an appointment. After outreach, 6 appointments were scheduled, and 10 patients received follow-up education from their primary nurses. These findings highlight the need for more frequent, trauma-informed conversations as well as targeted education and logistical support. Proactive, patient-centered engagement may improve cervical cancer screening rates and outcomes among people living with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.