ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
A Clinlabomics-Based Machine Learning Model Accurately Differentiates Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Atypical Benign Focal Hepatic Lesion.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The differential diagnosis of radiological image atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and atypical benign focal hepatic lesion (aBFHL) is a challenge. We aimed to develop a diagnostic model based on the new concept of clinlabomics to address this challenge. Patients and Methods: Pathologically diagnosed 466 patients (252 aHCC and 214 aBFHL) and their clinlabomic data were retrospectively collected. The patients were split into two sets based on admission time for training and testing models to differentiate aHCC from aBFHL. The models were developed using the three best-performing algorithms and key features selected from 18 clinlabomic indicators. The best model was validated and evaluated for classification ability by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, fitness by calibration curve, and clinical utility by decision curve. Model interpretability was analyzed through SHapley Additive exPlanations, and model application was realized via an easy-to-use online calculator. Results: Random forest (RF), support vector machine, and linear discriminant analysis were the top three algorithms. Six features (hepatitis B surface antigen, sex, alpha-fetoprotein, aspartate aminotransferase, platelets, and age) were selected. Three models were developed using the selected algorithms and features, and the RF model was the optimal one, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.954 and a diagnostic accuracy of 92.5% for the testing set. Notably, this model also outperformed for early-stage, small, and AFP-negative aHCCs, with AUCs of 0.976-0.982 and accuracies of 93.2-93.8%. The RF model performed well in terms of calibration, net benefit gain, interpretability, and application. Conclusion: The clinlabomics-based diagnostic model is valuable in the differential diagnosis of various types of aHCC from aBFHL, including early-stage, small, and AFP-negative aHCCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.