ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Smart sensing-enabled risk-aware nitrogen prescriptions via conformal profit bounds for precision agriculture.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Smart sensing is becoming central to plant science because it supports crop management decisions that reflect dynamic plant-environment interactions rather than field-level averages. Nitrogen fertilization is one of the most important decisions in precision agriculture, but site-specific prescriptions are often difficult to trust because spatial and seasonal variability can make point recommendations unstable. Methods: We propose an uncertainty-aware nitrogen prescription framework that combines yield-response modeling with conformal prediction intervals and propagates uncertainty into profit bounds under an environmental proxy penalty. Nitrogen rates are selected by maximizing the lower confidence bound of profit, and the framework allows abstention when competing rates are indistinguishable or uncertainty is excessive. Evaluation used a leakage-free group split of 10,000 samples from a Kaggle yield dataset. Results: The selected tree-ensemble model achieved RMSE 1.531 and MAE 1.214. Conformal intervals reached empirical coverage of 0.912 at the 0.90 target and 0.963 at the 0.95 target. Expected-profit optimization gave mean profit 4.68 with mean N 121.34, whereas the risk-aware strategy gave mean profit 4.54 with mean N 112.07 and lower variability. Abstention withheld recommendations for 18.4% and 27.9% of cases at 0.90 and 0.95 coverage. Discussion: The framework supports conservative, trustworthy nitrogen decisions and promotes practical nutrient stewardship in variable agricultural fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.