ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on the E-MOTIVE Postpartum Haemorrhage Bundle in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Implementation Facilitators and Challenges.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization proposed a clinical care bundle as a first response for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), a leading cause of maternal deaths. A large trial was conducted to evaluate its effectiveness, with Tanzania among the participating countries. We explored the experiences of healthcare workers during the early implementation of this bundle within the broader trial. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted to understand the early implementation experiences of the PPH bundle. We held six focus group discussions (FGDs) with healthcare workers, clinical leads designated as champions, and research nurses from all six facilities that implemented the intervention in Tanzania. A d-eductive qualitative thematic analysis was performed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to structure our findings. We reported on four domains: the intervention and its implementation, individual attributes, and the inner and outer contexts. Results: Healthcare workers reported positive experiences during implementation of the PPH first-response bundle. The innovation included several known components: calibrated drape for early detection, on-site training, facility audits, champions and the PPH care bundle comprising uterine massage, oxytocics, tranexamic acid and intravenous fluids. Individual participants appreciated the multi-component strategies that addressed chronic issues, including the lack of objective measurement of blood loss, inadequate skills, and supply shortages. Additionally, local clinical leads who served as champions increased local ownership and accountability. Facility-level challenges included staff rotation and a lack of clear communication, particularly when managing at-risk women. The availability of external support for training, supplies, and drugs required to administer the bundle, along with strong support from the districts and regional health management teams, enhanced the adoption and implementation process. Conclusion: The components of the bundle and the implementation strategies were well received and perceived as reducing the risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage and potentially saving lives. The perceived successes were contributed by the interconnectedness of the different strategies used. Facilities and countries aiming to scale need to harness these strategies that target the health system. In addition, there is a need to strengthen local facility audits, document and address chronic challenges affecting staff dynamics and supplies. District, regional and national leadership in adopting and integrating new clinical practices are key.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.