Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125569›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

From Concept to Practice: Advancements in Standardized Patient Methodology.

G Angeline Grace, Sujitha Pandian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G Angeline GraceCommunity Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sujitha PandianCommunity Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of standardized patients (SPs) in medical education has evolved significantly over the past few decades, serving as a crucial component in the training and assessment of healthcare professionals. This narrative review explores recent innovations and developments in the field, focusing on enhancing realism, improving training protocols, and refining assessment techniques. As the demand for high-quality patient-centered care rises, so too does the need for more effective simulation-based education methods. It examines key advancements such as the integration of high-fidelity simulations, the use of virtual and hybrid models, and the incorporation of advanced feedback mechanisms. These innovations aim to improve learner outcomes by providing more realistic, nuanced patient interactions that better prepare healthcare professionals for real-world scenarios. Furthermore, we discuss the evolving role of technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted simulations and virtual reality (VR), in transforming SP methodologies. It also addresses challenges, including ensuring standardization across various institutions, maintaining patient safety, and addressing the psychological impact on SPs. By bridging the gap between conceptual innovation and practical application, these advancements contribute to more effective training programs, ultimately enhancing the competence and confidence of future healthcare providers. Key areas for future research are also identified, particularly regarding the long-term impact of these methodologies on both patient outcomes and healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Innovationmethodologypracticepseudo patientssimulation

Identifiers

PMID42125569
PMCPMC13160187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.