Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125514›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

Surgical Timing After Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Association With Clinical Outcomes.

Mallory B Lane, Jacob Siahaan, James M Gregory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mallory B LaneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1000-6177
Jacob SiahaanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
James M GregoryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-7158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations continually lacks consensus between providers, and while low-grade injuries generally respond well to conservative management, high-grade injury management is more complex. For patients requiring surgery, the effect of the timing of surgery with respect to the original injury on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Hypothesis: Clinical outcome measures would worsen as the time between ACJ dislocation injury and surgery increased. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A large nationwide insurance claims database was queried for patients who had an ACJ dislocation injury using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. Surgical management via ACJ repair or ACJ reconstruction was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes 23550 and 23552, respectively. The time between the date of initial ACJ dislocation diagnosis and the date of surgery was used to separate patients into 4 temporal subgroups with the following parameters: 0 to 4 weeks, 4 weeks to 3 months, 3 months to 1 year, and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes-including complication rate, infection rate, and fracture rate-were compared between temporal and procedural subgroups. Outcomes were compared using chi-square tests. Results: A total of 13,194 patient met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study, of whom 8639 received surgical management of their ACJ dislocation within 4 weeks of initial injury diagnosis, 2210 between 4 weeks and 3 months, 1264 between 3 months and 1 year, and 1081 more than 1 year after injury diagnosis. The rate of all measured adverse clinical outcomes increased over time as surgical management was delayed in the ACJ repair subgroup, and the rates of revisions and complications increased over time as surgical management was delayed in the ACJ reconstruction subgroup. Conclusion: The rate of all measured adverse clinical outcomes increased over time as surgical management was delayed in the ACJ repair subgroup, and the rate of revisions and complications increased over time as surgical management was delayed in the ACJ reconstruction subgroup. Further research is needed to define the role of injury severity and classification in these outcomes and identify which patients would benefit from early surgical intervention.

Indexed as

acromioclavicular jointacromioclavicular joint reconstructionacromioclavicular joint repairacromioclavicular joint separation

Identifiers

PMID42125514
PMCPMC13158484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.