ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Surgical Positioning in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Comparable Outcomes but Longer Operative Times in the Beach-Chair Position.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) can be performed with patients in either the lateral decubitus (LDP) or beach-chair position (BCP). There are limited data exploring the effect of patient positioning on outcomes after RCR. Hypothesis: There will be a difference in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR in LDP versus BCP, and a significantly shorter operating room time in LDP to account for positioning. Study Design: Cohort study: Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were propensity score matched for tear size and demographic variables including age, body mass index, sex, and workers' compensation status. Patients were included who had an isolated arthroscopic primary RCR with ≥2 years of PRO data available. Results: A total of 160 patients, 80 in each of LDP and BCP, were included in the study. There were no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons function scores, and both groups improved at 2 years from 14.0 to 26.2 (95% CI, 12.7-15.3; 25.1-27.3) in BCP and 13.9 to 25.8 (95% CI, 24.8-26.9) in LDP ( Conclusion: Overall, PROs and complication rates were largely equivocal between the 2 groups at 2 years. Total operative time was shorter with LDP, reflecting the effect of setup for BCP. Patient positioning does not appear to affect patient outcomes, and surgeons should pick the positioning they are most facile with performing arthroscopic RCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.