Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125460›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Sociodemographic factors, anxiety and attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence among nurses.

Eman Alnazly, Nadine Absy, Nader Absy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eman AlnazlyFaculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Nadine AbsyMedical Education Department, Clinical Teaching Fellow South Tyneside Sunderland National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Nader AbsyStudent at Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although generative artificial intelligence offers substantial potential benefits in healthcare, negative attitudes and elevated anxiety among nurses may hinder its effective integration into clinical practice. Evidence regarding the psychological impact of generative artificial intelligence on nurses remains limited. Objective: This study examined the relationships among sociodemographic characteristics, anxiety, and attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence among nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational design was employed. Data were collected from 312 hospital nurses using online questionnaires assessing sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes toward artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence-related anxiety. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics software version 28. Results: Higher levels of artificial intelligence-related anxiety were associated with less favorable attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Sociodemographic characteristics and anxiety scores collectively explained 49.4% of the total variance in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Gender, experience with artificial intelligence, use of artificial intelligence in nursing care, awareness of artificial intelligence applications in healthcare, hours spent on the internet, age, and professional experience accounted for 24.7% of the variance in negative attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence. Conclusion: Anxiety and experiential factors play a central role in shaping nurses' attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence. Increasing nurses' exposure to and awareness of artificial intelligence in nursing practice may reduce anxiety and support its acceptance and appropriate use.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence anxietyattitudes toward technologydigital healthgenerative artificial intelligencehealthcare innovationnursingsociodemographic factorstechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42125460
PMCPMC13158201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.