ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2026
Efficacy of Ninjin'yoeito in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Clinical Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is the standard treatment for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its effectiveness is limited owing to adverse effects, particularly chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world efficacy of Ninjin'yoeito (NYT), a traditional Kampo medicine, in improving chemotherapy tolerance and reducing adverse effects during AC with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Methods: Fifty-eight patients undergoing AC with CAPOX for CRC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received NYT (N group) and those who did not receive NYT (C group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize baseline differences. Outcomes, including appetite loss, fatigue, CIPN, and relative dose intensity (RDI), were compared between the groups. Results: According to the post-matching analysis, the N group demonstrated significant reductions in appetite loss (Grade ≥1:16 vs. 10; Conclusion: NYT could improve AC outcomes by reducing adverse effects and supporting a higher RDI, particularly in patients with frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.