ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2026
Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Lateral Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Optimal indications for lateral lymph node dissection in patients with rectal cancer have not yet been established. To address this, we previously proposed magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria that combine long- and short-axis measurements. However, the initial study derived criteria based on an analysis with knowledge of histopathological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to prospectively validate the clinical utility of these magnetic resonance imaging-based criteria. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter validation study including 125 patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery with lateral lymph node dissection. Two independent reviewers who were blinded to the clinical and pathological data evaluated 250 lateral pelvic regions using pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging. Interobserver agreement was assessed using weighted kappa statistics. The need for lateral lymph node dissection was evaluated using predefined size-based criteria and compared with the histopathological outcomes. Results: Among the 250 lateral regions evaluated, 206 were dissected, and 29 were histopathologically positive for lateral lymph node metastases. Two reviewers independently assessed whether lateral lymph node dissection was required or could be omitted in 250 regions based on the criteria, and the interobserver agreement was good (weighted kappa = 0.671). The proposed criteria achieved sensitivities of 86.2% and 82.8% and specificities of 57.1% and 52.0% for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion: This validation study demonstrated that our magnetic resonance imaging-based size criteria are clinically applicable and effective for the preoperative diagnosis of lateral lymph node metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.