Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125409›Full record

ArticleEngineering with computers2026

IGANets: Isogeometric analysis networks and their applications to linear structural analysis problems.

Matthias Möller, Günther Obermair, Isabella Singer, Christian Gollmann, Alessandro Reali, Stefanie Elgeti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering with computers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias MöllerDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Günther ObermairInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Gumpendorferstr. 7, 1070 Vienna, Austria.
Isabella SingerInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Gumpendorferstr. 7, 1070 Vienna, Austria.
Christian GollmannInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Gumpendorferstr. 7, 1070 Vienna, Austria.
Alessandro RealiDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, via A.Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Stefanie ElgetiInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Gumpendorferstr. 7, 1070 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast numerical predictions have become an indispensable component of modern engineering design workflows, whether in interactive design within computer-aided design (CAD) environments or in multi-query numerical tasks such as design optimization and uncertainty quantification. Depending on the context, "fast" may refer to near real-time predictions within a few seconds, or simply to methods that are significantly faster than high-fidelity simulations, for example those based on the finite element method (FEM). With the aim of providing a tool that not only enables such accelerated predictions but also integrates seamlessly into established workflows, we introduce the concept of IGANets. IGANets are spline-based, physics-informed machine learning models that can be integrated naturally between CAD representations and numerical analysis tools, particularly those based on isogeometric analysis (IGA). Unlike purely data-driven approaches, IGANets do not inherently rely on precomputed training data; instead, they are formulated in a collocation setting directly from physical models. In this paper, we present the IGANets concept and demonstrate its feasibility through numerical experiments for the Poisson equation and linear elasticity. In addition, we investigate a multi-instance linear-elasticity setting with varying I-beam-like geometries and boundary conditions in order to assess the generalization capability of the framework. The results show that IGANets can predict solutions for previously unseen problem instances within the training range with improved accuracy as the number of training samples increases.

Indexed as

Isogeometric collocationPhysics-informed machine learningReal-time designSurrogate models

Identifiers

PMID42125409
PMCPMC13158258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.