ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2014
Statement on a conceptual framework for bovine tuberculosis.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on Risk Factors for Bovine Tuberculosis in the Disease-Free Regions of Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tuberculosis in Small Ruminants in Portugal: A Retrospective Laboratory-Based Study (2012-2023).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The European Union One Health 2023 Zoonoses report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- The European Union One Health 2022 Zoonoses Report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- The European Union One Health 2021 Zoonoses Report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing to Unravel the Genetic Diversity of a PrevalentFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Vaccination Against Porcine Circovirus-2 Reduces Severity of Tuberculosis in Wild Boar.EcoHealth · 2018Article
- The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2016.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2016Article
- Statement on a conceptual framework for bovine tuberculosis.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Control and eradication of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a challenge owing to the complex interactions between the pathogen, hosts and local environments. Modelling various bTB situations may lead to improved understanding of the ways in which different factor combinations and interactions influence occurrence, surveillance outcomes and control efforts. A conceptual framework would help to outline, from an epidemiological perspective, which factors influence bTB infection, detection and control, and how they might interact in various European situations. The conceptual framework on bTB described in this statement is built around an anchor model describing the interactions between the most important biological and non-biological parameters involved in bTB infection, detection and control. The interactions are examined at three levels, corresponding to three 'units of interest', in the case of bTB the animal, the herd and the area levels. The conceptual framework is intended to help understand the inputs that should be considered when developing a specific component of the episystem (i.e. the ecological context of the epidemiological problem). It should be able to help both in the generation and interpretation of predictive and analytical models (dealing with a specific component of the framework) designed to answer specific questions regarding bTB. The relationship between the conceptual framework and particular examples related to the force of infection, the non-biological context and testing of bTB are explained and discussed in the document.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.