ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
International expert consensus on a structured approach to training for cryoballoon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation procedure using performance metrics.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Training on cryoballoon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation (CBA-AF) procedures usually takes place Methods and results: During a series of five face-to-face and two online meetings, a core metrics team of three CBA for AF procedure experts, two biomedical engineers, and a senior behavioural scientist performed a detailed task deconstruction of a CBA-AF. They identified performance metrics that constitute an optimal approach for performance of the procedure for training purposes. The metrics were then subjected to an in-person modified Delphi panel meeting with 16 international procedure experts. Twelve procedure phases, with 239 procedure steps, 113 errors, and 74 critical errors were identified. After the modified Delphi process, there were 244 procedure steps, 111 errors, and 91 critical errors. Metrics before and after Delphi were highly correlated ( Conclusion: Performance metrics that accurately characterize a reference approach to CBA-AF were developed by a core group of experts. These metrics were endorsed by an international panel of very experienced peers. Reliable and valid metrics underpin effective, quality-assured, structured procedural training on CBA-AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.