ReviewEuropean heart journal open2025
Early aortic valve intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a clinical dilemma in evolution.
Review in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- TAVI in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: is the economic case universal?European heart journal open · 2026Article
- First quinquennium completed: highlights fromEuropean heart journal open · 2026Article
- Aortic Valve Interventions in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Who, Why, and When?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long non-coding RNAs as molecular hubs integrating inflammatory and osteogenic pathways in calcific aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally relied on watchful waiting until the onset of symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction. However, the FDA's approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Sapien 3 platform in May 2025, based on the EARLY TAVR trial, has intensified the debate over early intervention. This Viewpoint synthesizes evidence from randomized trials (RECOVERY, AVATAR, EVOLVED, EARLY TAVR) and registries (HAVEC, VALVENOR) to evaluate the role of early aortic valve replacement (AVR). Early intervention is associated with reductions in combined endpoints of cardiovascular hospitalizations, stroke, and mortality in selected patients, with the EARLY TAVR demonstrating a 50% reduction in major cardiovascular events. Nonetheless, evidence remains inconsistent, particularly in low-risk populations, as the EVOLVED trial showed no mortality benefit in patients with myocardial fibrosis, warranting cautious interpretation. A conservative surveillance strategy remains appropriate in some cases, supported by the low annual risk of sudden death (i.e. 0.65% per year) and ongoing concerns over valve durability and procedural risks. Given the heterogeneity of patient and valve phenotypes, a personalized risk assessment, combining clinical evaluation, biomarkers (troponin, BNP), and imaging (echocardiography, CMR), is proposed to identify high-risk patients and optimize the timing of early intervention. Expert heart team guidance is essential, and routine early intervention cannot yet be recommended. Further research is needed to refine strategies and improve outcomes in this evolving clinical landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.