ArticleLandscape ecology2026
Disturbance-mediated apparent competition across boreal landscapes: the role of primary productivity.
Article in Landscape ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Disturbance-mediated apparent competition (DMAC) links landscape disturbance, alternative prey, and predator dynamics in ways that can reduce caribou recruitment and survival. Although DMAC underpins national recovery planning for boreal caribou ( Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that net primary productivity (NPP) governs the strength of DMAC by influencing predator-prey assemblages and shaping patterns of disturbance. Our objective was to determine how these NPP-linked factors influence caribou recruitment and adult female survival at a continental scale. Methods: Using data on caribou recruitment (40 study areas) and survival (30 study areas) from across Canada, along with maps of NPP, disturbance footprints, estimates of moose density, and species richness, we assessed how NPP influences DMAC's effects on caribou. Results: Many of the explanatory variables were strongly correlated. Recruitment and survival declined with increasing NPP, anthropogenic disturbance, predator richness, prey richness, and moose density. Higher NPP increased disturbance, which in turn increased prey and predator richness and decreased caribou recruitment. For survival, NPP increased moose density and ultimately decreased caribou survival. Conclusions: At a continental scale, DMAC diminishes as a potential limiting factor to caribou as NPP declines. Anthropogenic disturbance is concentrated in high-NPP portions of the landscape. High-NPP regions support greater predator and alternative prey species, increasing predation risk for caribou calves. Recognizing the role of NPP in concentrating anthropogenic disturbances and altering trophic interactions is essential for conservation strategies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-026-02336-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.