ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Integrating acoustic, prosodic, and phonological features for automatic Alzheimer's detection.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for effective intervention. While prior research has explored speech-based biomarkers for AD, the role of acoustic, prosodic, and phonological features, individually and in combination, remains underexplored. Methods: This study systematically investigates a broad set of continuous acoustic and prosodic features alongside discrete phonological features for AD detection. Experiments were conducted using the publicly available ADReSS Challenge dataset to ensure comparability with prior work. We evaluated feature importance using four feature ranking methods and assessed classification performance using seven machine learning models. Both individual feature groups and their combinations were analyzed. Results: Acoustic features demonstrated strong predictive performance, and the best results were obtained by combining acoustic, prosodic, and phonological features. The optimal configuration, using ensemble learning, achieved an F1-score of 0.89. This performance surpasses previous speech-only approaches on the ADReSS dataset and approaches the best overall reported result. Additional validation on the Delaware corpus (focused on mild cognitive impairment) and a longitudinal speech sample from President Ronald Reagan yielded positive results. Discussion: These findings indicate that different layers of speech representation provide complementary information for detecting cognitive decline. The results suggest that speech characteristics beyond lexical content are highly informative for AD detection. This highlights the potential of multi-layered, non-invasive, and lexicon-independent speech analysis as a tool for early diagnosi sof Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.