Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125229›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Why does LDL-C follow a different paradigm from other endocrine-metabolic diseases in cardiovascular prevention?

José Luis Sánchez-Quesada, Antonio Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José Luis Sánchez-QuesadaCardiovascular Biochemistry, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio PérezCIBER of Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Diseases (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular prevention has traditionally focused on achieving progressively lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, particularly in individuals classified as high risk. However, accumulating evidence from epidemiological, genetic and clinical studies suggests that cardiovascular risk is strongly influenced by cumulative lifetime exposure to LDL-C rather than by isolated LDL-C levels achieved later in life. From an endocrine perspective, LDL-C should be viewed as a chronic metabolic exposure whose pathogenic impact depends not only on its intensity, but also on its duration over time. This Perspective integrates evidence from longitudinal cohort studies, familial hypercholesterolaemia and Mendelian randomisation analyses, and contrasts current lipid management paradigms with preventive strategies routinely applied to other endocrine-metabolic disorders. While contemporary guidelines recognise the causal role of LDL-C and increasingly acknowledge lifetime risk, this recognition is not always fully translated into operational criteria for early intervention, particularly in younger adults. Within this context, earlier approaches aimed at limiting cumulative LDL-C exposure may offer additional long-term benefit, especially in individuals with long life expectancy. This Perspective, grounded in an endocrine framework, is intended to complement, rather than replace, current guideline-based strategies by highlighting the potential value of incorporating cumulative exposure into preventive decision-making.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLEndocrine System DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesHumansCholesterol, LDLcardiovascular preventioncumulative exposuredyslipidaemiaLDL cholesterollifetime risk

Identifiers

PMID42125229
PMCPMC13158069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.