Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125214›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026

Long-term risk of irritable bowel syndrome associated with social isolation and loneliness: a large-scale prospective cohort study with mediation analysis.

Yesheng Zhou, Si Liu, Qian Zhang, Shutian Zhang, Shanshan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yesheng ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Medical Devices, Beijing, China.
Si LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Medical Devices, Beijing, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Medical Devices, Beijing, China.
Shutian ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Medical Devices, Beijing, China.
Shanshan WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; Beijing Key Laboratory of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Medicine and Medical Devices, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing 100050, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-8093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social isolation and loneliness are common among older adults and have been linked to metabolic disorders, psychological conditions, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. However, their associations with incident irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain unclear. Objective: To investigate the associations of social isolation and loneliness with incident IBS risk, and the mediating roles of anxiety or depression. Design: Population-based prospective cohort study. Methods: Participants without IBS and with available social isolation and loneliness data at recruitment were included ( Results: During a median follow-up of 14.5 years, 8307 (2.1%) incident IBS cases were identified. Overall, 209,081 (53.0%), 149,729 (38.0%), and 35,648 (9.0%) participants were classified as least, moderately, and most isolated, respectively. The 14-year cumulative incidence of IBS increased from 2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-2.1) in the least isolated group to 2.2% (95% CI: 2.2-2.3) and 2.6% (95% CI: 2.4-2.8) in the moderately and most isolated groups (population-attributable fraction (PAF) = 3.6%). Compared with the least isolated group, most isolated individuals had a 20.0% higher IBS risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11-1.29), with 24.7% of the effect mediated by depression or anxiety. The 14-year cumulative incidence of IBS was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.9-3.4) in the lonely group versus 2.1% (95% CI: 2.1-2.1) in the non-lonely group (PAF = 2.1%). Compared with non-lonely individuals (95.2%), lonely individuals (4.8%) showed a 46.0% increased IBS risk (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.34-1.59), with 26.5% of the effect mediated by depression or anxiety. In addition, one increment in social isolation score (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11) and loneliness score (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23-1.32) were associated with 8.0% and 27.0% higher IBS risk, respectively. Particularly, most isolated and lonely individuals exhibited a 60.0% greater IBS risk versus their non-lonely and least isolated counterparts (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.35-1.89). Conclusion: Both social isolation and loneliness are associated with increased IBS risk, partially mediated by depression or anxiety. Multi-level psychosocial and environmental interventions may help reduce IBS burden.

Indexed as

cohort studiesirritable bowel syndromelonelinessmediation analysissocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42125214
PMCPMC13158496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.