ReviewSports medicine and health science2026
Update: Is exercise-induced oxidative stress a friend or foe?
Review in Sports medicine and health science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise-induced lysosomal adaptations in skeletal muscle.Sports medicine and health science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free radicals (radicals) are highly reactive atoms or molecules that contain one or more unpaired electrons in their outermost shell. The first evidence that muscular exercise increases radical production and promotes oxidative damage to tissues was reported almost five decades ago. Following this milestone discovery, many studies have corroborated the finding that exercise increases the production of radicals and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting in oxidative damage to macromolecules in muscles and other tissues. Although exercise-induced ROS production is associated with oxidative damage in many tissues, growing evidence reveals that ROS produced in contracting muscles act as signaling molecules to promote healthy exercise-induced adaptations in skeletal muscles and other tissues. These adaptive responses include increased mitochondrial volume, improved antioxidant capacity, and expression of cytoprotective proteins. Therefore, a key question emerges: "Is exercise-induced ROS production a friend or foe?" This review provides a state-of-the-art discussion of both the positive and negative effects of exercise-induced ROS production by examining the consequences of both oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules and the redox signaling-induced adaptations that occur in muscle fibers. To address the question of whether exercise-induced ROS production is a friend or foe we conclude with a risk/benefit analysis of the biological effects of exercise-induced production of ROS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.